Support Torah
Recordings

Torah and Tea Toldos 2017

Classes, Toldos – Torah and Tea 2017

אבות ובנים: ישמעאל, עשו והקירוב של ילדים שסטו מן הדרך

Fathers and Sons: Yishmael, Esav and Reaching Children Who Strayed

This shiur compares Yitzchak and Esav with Avraham and Yishmael: why Yishmael, who did teshuvah, is not Avraham's true seed, and why Esav's head rested in Yitzchak's lap. It contrasts the approaches of Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov and teaches never to give up on any child.
Prev Search
0:00 0:00
Next

1. Comparing the Relationships: Yitzchak & Esav vs. Avraham & Yishmael

This week’s parsha, Toldos, offers a fascinating look at the relationships between fathers and sons—specifically, Yitzchak and Esav, and Avraham and Yishmael. We see that Yitzchak wanted to give the blessings to Esav, indicating a close relationship between them. Similarly, we can compare this dynamic to that of Avraham and Yishmael. The Gemara and Rashi point out that Yishmael did teshuvah—repentance—at the end of his life. We know this because, in last week’s parsha, when Avraham is buried, it says that both Yitzchak and Yishmael buried him. Rashi explains that since Yitzchak is mentioned first, it shows that Yishmael acknowledged his younger brother’s precedence, indicating he had repented.

Despite this repentance, Yishmael is not considered the true seed of Avraham. Even though he was Avraham’s son through Hagar the maidservant, Sarah insisted that “the son of this maidservant will not inherit with my son.” This creates a paradox: on one hand, Yishmael did teshuvah, but on the other hand, he is not counted as Avraham’s true continuation.

In contrast, Esav never did teshuvah. Rashi even notes that Avraham died five years early so he wouldn’t witness Esav becoming a rasha—wicked person. Hashem promised Avraham a good old age so he would be spared from seeing Esav’s negative behavior. Unlike Yishmael, Esav remained estranged until his death.

2. The Burial at Me’oras HaMachpelah: The Fate of Esav’s Head

The Gemara recounts an intriguing episode at Yaakov’s burial. Yaakov instructed his sons to bury him in Me’oras HaMachpelah—the cave already containing Adam and Chava, Avraham and Sarah, and Yitzchak and Rivkah. Only one spot remained for another pair. When Yaakov’s sons arrived to bury him, Esav appeared and claimed rights to the remaining spot as an inheritor.

A dispute ensued over whether Yaakov had purchased the burial rights from Esav along with the birthright. Esav demanded proof of purchase; however, the documents were left in Egypt. While they sent someone back for them, one of Yaakov’s grandsons grew impatient with the delay and struck Esav with a stick—resulting in Esav’s death according to the Gemara.

The Gemara describes that Esav’s eyeballs fell out from the blow; Targum Yonasan adds that his head rolled into the lap of his father Yitzchak. This detail raises a halachic question: generally it is forbidden for a rasha to be buried next to a tzaddik—righteous person—as seen in Tanach where even a false prophet was resurrected rather than remain buried next to Elisha.

3. The Paradox of Esav’s Head: Spiritual Implications

If it is so improper for a wicked person to be buried near a righteous one, how could Esav’s head end up in Yitzchak’s lap? The Rebbe addresses this paradox by explaining that there was an aspect of holiness—kedusha—in Esav’s head. Intellectually or spiritually “from above,” there was something redeemable about him; but “down here,” in action and behavior, he remained wicked.

This distinction suggests that while most of Esav was irredeemable in practice (milmatah l’maalah—from below upward), there remained an essential spark or potential within him (milmaalah l’matah—from above downward). Thus only his head—representing intellect or potential—was worthy of resting with his father.

This contrasts sharply with Yishmael: despite doing teshuvah, he is not considered part of Avraham's spiritual legacy due to being born from Hagar. Yet halachically and spiritually there are deeper debates about what constitutes being part of “the seed” or legacy of Avraham or Yitzchak.

4. Why Isn’t Yishmael Considered Avraham’s Seed?

A common explanation is that since Yishmael was born from Hagar—a maidservant (shifcha)—he cannot qualify as true seed or heir of Avraham. However, as pointed out by the Rebbe [UNCLEAR: and discussed after Shabbos sermons], this cannot be the sole reason: many of Yaakov's sons were also born from maidservants yet are counted among the tribes.

The timing also matters: some suggest that since Yishmael was born before Avraham had his bris milah—covenant through circumcision—Yishmael wasn’t truly Jewish at birth. Only after accepting monotheism through circumcision did Avraham become fully Jewish; thus only children born after (i.e., Yitzchak) are considered true heirs.

This leads to complex debates among commentators regarding inheritance rights and spiritual lineage—whether being born from a maidservant or before conversion affects status as an inheritor or spiritual descendant.

5. The Spiritual Approaches of Avraham and Yitzchak

The Rebbe explains fundamental differences between how Avraham and Yitzchak influenced others spiritually:

  • Avraham: His approach was to shine godliness outward without demanding internal change (milmaalah l’matah). He brought holiness down to people at their level—smothering them with love and light regardless of their refinement or readiness for transformation.
  • An Analogy: Like a teacher whose presence alone keeps students quiet—even if they haven’t internalized discipline themselves—the effect remains external rather than transformative.
  • This Approach: Allowed even those like Yishmael (who lacked refinement) to do teshuvah. They might not become truly elevated but could still be influenced toward right action where they stood.
  • Talmudic Example: When Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah opened up Torah study for all students regardless of their inner state (contrasting with Rabban Gamliel's exclusivity), many more came—but they weren’t necessarily transformed inside.

6. The Approach of Yitzchak: Refinement from Within

Yitzchak's method differed fundamentally:

  • "Digging Wells": He sought to uncover hidden potential within each person—to refine them by removing layers covering their inner soul (Neshama). This required recipients who were already somewhat receptive or refined.
  • The Limitation: Unlike Avraham who could reach anyone anywhere (even outside Eretz Yisrael), Yitzchak could only operate within refined environments (he never left Eretz Yisrael) and couldn’t extend himself outwardly (he didn’t take a maidservant when Rivkah struggled with infertility).
  • The Case with Esav: Although he loved Esav deeply—and saw potential (“the head”)—Yitzchak couldn’t reach or refine him because Esav refused to let go of his negative behaviors (“the body”). Only when separated could any spark be salvaged.
  • Sparks from Esav: Some great converts like Rabbi Meir descended from Esav—evidence that sparks remained in “the head” even if lost in practice.

7. The Synthesis in Yaakov—and Lessons for Today

The unique quality of Yaakov:

  • Synthesis: Yaakov combined both approaches: reaching out broadly like Avraham while also refining deeply like Yitzchak.
  • A Chassidic Analogy: The Baal Shem Tov reached everyone everywhere (chesed); the Maggid focused on elevating refined disciples (gevurah); while the Alter Rebbe synthesized both by making deep teachings accessible intellectually.
  • The Rebbe's Approach: In our generation too, some argue certain Jews are too far gone—but Chabad philosophy insists on reaching even those who seem lost (“Esavs” or “Yishmaels”), finding their spark and lifting them up.
  • Blessings as Heritage: When Yitzchak sought to bless Esav, it wasn’t just material—it was sharing spiritual heritage and connection with Hashem.
  • No One Is Beyond Reach: Even those who seem most distant retain some essential connection—a “head” worthy of being reclaimed.

8. Parenting Lessons & The Complexity of Good vs Bad Children

This parsha offers profound lessons about parenting troubled children—or those who stray from tradition (derech haTorah). Both Avraham and Yitzchak loved their wayward sons deeply; they bent over backwards trying to bring them close rather than pushing them away—even when ultimately unsuccessful.

This teaches us not to blame parents when children go astray—even our greatest ancestors faced such challenges despite their righteousness! At the same time we mustn’t write off any child: every soul retains some redeemable spark no matter how far they wander.

Toldos is thus a parsha filled with nuance—not simply good guys versus bad guys but shades of grey where even someone like Esav experiences pain (“Father, don’t you have a blessing left for me?”). While we may judge actions harshly, we must recognize lingering connections—and never give up hope for return or redemption.

9. Rivkah’s Role & Divine Providence in Jewish Destiny

The narrative also highlights Rivkah's critical role—not just as an agent of kindness (chesed) but as one embodying strength (gevurah). She understood what was at stake for Jewish destiny if left in Esav's hands; her actions ensured continuity through Yaakov even when it meant difficult choices against her own son.

This entire discussion underscores how our forefathers’ struggles mirror our own challenges—with children, community members, or ourselves—and reminds us always to seek out sparks wherever they may be found while recognizing our limitations as parents or teachers are not always failures but part of Hashem's greater plan for each soul's journey.

Leave Feedback