Support Torah
Recordings

Torah and Tea 5783

Classes, Lech Lecha – Torah and Tea 5783

נח, אברהם, ומשה: דגמים של אחריות ושותפות עם ה'

Noach, Avraham, and Moshe: Models of Responsibility and Partnership with Hashem

This shiur explores how Noach, Avraham, and Moshe Rabbeinu each modeled different approaches to responsibility for others. Drawing from Likkutei Sichos vol. 15 on Lech Lecha, it examines the shift from self-focused righteousness to true partnership with Hashem through action, prayer, and Torah study.
Prev Search
0:00 0:00
Next

1. Introduction to the Parsha and Sicha

This week’s Torah and Tea focuses on the portion of Lech Lecha—“Go for yourself”—in the year 5783, drawing from Likkutei Sichos volume 15, specifically a brief look at the third and fourth sicha. Today, due to some technical issues, we’ll keep things concise and try to connect a few ideas from these sichos, weaving in some thoughts about the weekly parsha and its relevance.

The parsha of Lech Lecha marks a transition in the Torah’s narrative. While earlier portions like Bereishis and Noach focus on creation, art, nature, and the beauty of the world, by Lech Lecha, we begin to see a shift towards more complex human stories. Even at the end of Bereishis, Hashem is already speaking about people spreading across the land and His desire to bring about change. There is joy in these stories but also an undercurrent of challenge—a sense that not everything ends happily.

2. The Structure of Bereishis, Noach, and Lech Lecha

The Torah divides these opening parshiyos in a way that seems deliberate: Bereishis is a happy beginning but ends with some darkness; Noach, too, has elements of both hope and tragedy; then comes Lech Lecha, which is described as an especially joyful week. This raises questions: Why are these sections divided as they are? Why not blend some of the joy from one into another? What is unique about each?

The answer lies in understanding that each parsha serves a distinct purpose. The Rebbe often emphasized living with the times—meaning living with the weekly parsha—and drawing personal lessons from it. Each section reflects a different stage in humanity’s relationship with Hashem and with creation itself.

3. The Purpose of Creation and Giving of Torah

A central theme in Chassidus is Hashem’s desire for a dwelling place in this world—a fusion between spiritual and physical realms. Before the giving of the Torah (Matan Torah), there was a clear separation: spirituality remained above while physicality remained below; they did not mix. When Hashem descended upon Har Sinai—“Vayeired Hashem al Har Sinai”—it marked the first time that spirituality entered our physical world.

This event established that Hashem wants us to bridge these worlds—to bring holiness into our daily lives. Until then, there was an unbridgeable gap between spiritual pursuits and mundane existence. The giving of the Torah changed this dynamic forever, allowing us to become partners with Hashem in elevating creation.

4. Comparing Noach, Avraham, and Moshe Rabbeinu

If we look at three key figures—Noach, Avraham, and Moshe Rabbeinu—we see different models for relating to others:

  • Noach: He followed Hashem’s command to build an ark over 120 years so people would ask about it and perhaps repent. However, he did not actively advocate for his generation; he focused on his own righteousness.
  • Avraham: When Hashem threatened Sodom, Avraham pleaded for mercy—not just for himself or his family but for any righteous people who might be found there. Still, his advocacy centered on saving tzaddikim (the righteous) rather than transforming reshaim (the wicked).
  • Moshe Rabbeinu: Moshe went further than both Noach and Avraham by pleading even for those who had sinned gravely against Hashem. He argued on behalf of all Jews—even those who were farthest from righteousness—demonstrating ultimate selflessness.

5. The Critique of Noach’s Approach

The Zohar critiques Noach for focusing only on himself: he built the ark as instructed but did not go out of his way to save others unless they approached him first. Rashi explains that building the ark over such a long period was meant to prompt questions so Noach could warn people about impending judgment—but he didn’t actively seek their repentance.

This approach is called being “a tzaddik in peltz”—a tzaddik in a fur coat. Just as fur keeps one person warm but doesn’t share warmth with others (unlike lighting a fire that warms everyone), so too Noach’s righteousness benefited only himself rather than uplifting his generation.

The Rebbe often emphasized not blaming or condemning others when tragedy strikes but instead seeking ways to uplift them—a contrast to Noach’s more insular approach.

6. Avraham’s Advocacy Versus Moshe’s Selflessness

Avraham took responsibility beyond himself by pleading for Sodom but still limited his advocacy to saving tzaddikim within those cities—not necessarily seeking transformation for all inhabitants. He asked if perhaps there were enough righteous individuals present to spare everyone else by association.

Moshe Rabbeinu surpassed even this level by advocating unconditionally for all Jews after major transgressions like the sin of the Golden Calf (Cheit HaEgel). He pleaded with Hashem not just for those who were innocent or righteous but even for those who had erred gravely—demonstrating true leadership by caring deeply for every member of Klal Yisrael regardless of their spiritual state.

7. The Value of Hard Work: Becoming Partners with Hashem

The Talmud teaches that “a person is created to work hard” (adam le’amal yivaleid). It further states that one prefers even a small measure earned through personal effort over much more received without labor—because true satisfaction comes from what we achieve through our own toil.

This principle applies both physically (through labor) and spiritually (through prayer and Torah study). The Rebbe explains that Hashem wants us to be creators like Him—to partner in creation through our own efforts rather than passively receiving everything without work.

8. Three Levels of Effort: Work, Prayer, Torah Study

The Talmud identifies three types of effort essential to fulfilling our purpose:

  • Amal melacha—Labor in work: Physical effort such as plowing fields or engaging in productive activity brings something new into existence.
  • Amal sicha—Labor in speech: This refers primarily to prayer (davening)—the unique human ability to connect with Hashem through words.
  • Amal Torah—Labor in Torah study: Diligently striving to understand Torah deepens our partnership with Hashem by bringing divine wisdom into our lives.

The combination of these three efforts allows us truly to become partners with Hashem—transforming ourselves and our world through creative action, heartfelt prayer, and dedicated learning. This is why Avraham valued Eretz Yisrael so highly: it was a place where people worked hard physically and spiritually—a legacy we continue today through our ongoing efforts in every realm.

Leave Feedback